Categories
For Edit

Analysis: Trump’s Senate trial matters regardless of outcome

FILE – In this Jan. 6, 2021, file photo, President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a rally in Washington. Arguments begin Tuesday, Feb. 9, in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump on allegations that he incited the violent mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File)

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — This matters.

The outcome may seem preordained in the unprecedented second impeachment trial of Donald Trump.

Democrats prosecuting the former president for inciting a deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol will struggle to persuade at least 17 Republicans to convict Trump and bar him from office. Forty-five of the 50 Republican senators backed a bid last month to dismiss the trial, essentially telegraphing how the final vote will play out.

But the trial set to begin Tuesday is ultimately a test of whether a president, holding an office that many of the nation’s founders feared could become too powerful in the wrong hands, is above the law. Senators will be forced to sit still, listen to evidence and wrestle with elemental questions about American democracy. There will be visual, visceral evidence, and the American people will also be sitting in their own form of judgment as they watch.

The verdict and the process itself will be scrutinized for generations.

“For historians, what that trial does is to provide additional evidence and documentation under oath,” said Carol Anderson, a professor of African American studies at Emory University. “It also gives us a sense of the strength, or the weakness, in American democracy as the senators are confronted with this evidence.”

That record is certain to be grisly, a reminder on a human level of the horror at the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Senators will review Trump’s call that morning to “fight like hell” before the mob of loyalists showed up to Capitol Hill to do just that. Senators will be reminded of the rioters’ chants calling for then-Vice President Mike Pence’s hanging. House prosecutors could resurface the image of a police officer crushed between doors, blood trickling from his mouth, as the violent crowd moved in. There might be additional evidence of how another officer, Brian Sicknick, died defending the building.

If that’s not enough, senators will be reminded of their own vulnerability as they fled the mob entering their chamber — one of the most rarefied spaces in Washington — in fear of their lives.

And then they’ll have to decide whether there should be consequences. But the potential of an acquittal doesn’t mean the trial should be abandoned before it begins, said Rep. Val Demings, who was an impeachment manager in Trump’s first trial.

“The jury not convicting is always a possibility,” the Florida Democrat said, recalling her previous career as the chief of the Orlando Police Department. “But decisions are never made solely on that.”

Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe Trump bears at least a moderate amount of responsibility for the riot, according to a poll released last week by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. That includes half who say Trump bears a great deal or quite a bit of responsibility.

Most Republicans absolve him of guilt, but about 3 in 10 think he bears at least a measure of blame for the events.

Of course, Congress has more on its plate than another fight over the previous president. In the early days of his administration, President Joe Biden is pushing a $1.9 trillion package to confront the coronavirus pandemic. He’s also pressing lawmakers on immigration, health care and climate change.

Lee Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana who served during President Bill Clinton’s impeachment, said a trial could be a “distraction” from larger priorities. He suggested censure could be a better use of time and that the historical record could be achieved through the creation of a commission like the one he helped lead to investigate the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But, he said, that only works if Congress is united on the need for a thorough investigation of what happened during the insurrection and provides the resources to back it up.

“If you’re going to do it, do it right,” Hamilton said.

As much as the trial is about history, the implications are just as powerful in the present moment. Leaders in capitals across the world are watching what happens in Washington to assess whether the U.S. remains committed to democratic principles. Steadfast American allies, including Germany and the United Kingdom, expressed shock at the insurrection.

U.S. foes seized on the violence to say that the United States could not now lecture others on the sanctity of democracy.

“American democracy is obviously limping on both feet,” Konstantin Kosachev, head of the foreign affairs committee in Russia’s upper house of parliament, said after the riot. “America no longer charts a course and therefore has lost all rights to set it — and even more so to impose it on others.”

It’s telling that Republicans aren’t going into the trial with a robust defense of Trump. Few are publicly defending his behavior in the runup to the insurrection, whether it’s his baseless insistence that the election was “stolen” or his more specific — and troubling — calls to supporters to rally on his behalf.

Instead, the GOP is narrowly focused on a more technical constitutional issue, arguing that a president can’t face an impeachment trial once out of office, a path they believe is easier to defend than trying to rationalize Trump’s actions.

Anticipating that posture, Democrats filed a pretrial brief noting there’s no “January exception” in the Constitution.

“Presidents do not get a free pass to commit high crimes and misdemeanors near the end of their term,” the House impeachment managers wrote.

The trial comes as the GOP is struggling with its future.

Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, has flirted with the possibility of purging Trump from the party. If Trump is convicted, the Senate could vote to bar him from seeking office again, a notable punishment for someone who has dangled the potential of a 2024 presidential run to keep bending the party to his will.

McConnell hasn’t yet said how he’ll vote, and, so far, only a few moderate Republicans seem certain to convict. They’re running into the reality that Trump’s supporters remain a dominant force in the party.

The trial “really will only reinforce what we already know about American politics,” said Brendan Buck, a top adviser to former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis. ”And in that, I mean we are so tribal and divided that there’s really no question where people will fall down on something that should generate thoughtful discourse and reflection about a fundamental democratic principle.”

___

EDITOR’S NOTE — Political Editor Steven Sloan has covered politics for The Associated Press since 2018. Follow him at http://twitter.com/stevenpsloan

 


— Associated Press

Categories
For Edit

Democrats launch ads against Marjorie Taylor Greene as McConnell blasts her as a ‘cancer’ on the Republican Party.

 

— NYT: Top Stories

Categories
For Edit

Amy Coney Barrett live stream and updates

Over Democratic objections, Republicans set an Oct. 22 Senate Judiciary Committee vote to advance the nomination.

— NYT: Top Stories

Categories
Politics

Fierce fight forward as presidential primaries poll prospects

Even though the American people are anticipating a fierce fight between the Democratic and Republican candidates for the 2020 presidential elections, a critic says one candidate is “weak.”

Greg Tift is a former State of N.J. employee, board member of CWA, and opinion writer and critic.
— Provided photo

While Rep. Incumbent President Donald J. Trump is looking forward to a second term in the Oval Office, he will have to contest the Democratic Party Presidential Nominee Joe Biden in the official presidential elections Nov. 3, this year.

With the 2020 Presidential Primary elections now wrapping up after voters have been going to both the polls and mailing in ballots, the critic questions Biden’s candidacy, while also criticizing Prez. Trump’s worthiness.

Greg Tift, a former State of New Jersey employee, Communications Workers of America (CWA) board member, and opinion writer, states that Biden is “Joe, the tailor-made foe.”

Tift explains that, “while Democrats are hopeful Biden will be the man that can defeat Donald Trump in the 2020 Presidential Elections, Republicans are thrilled by the prospect.”

He claims this is the case because Biden is “tailor-made” for the Republicans to campaign against because he is a “Republican sympathizer,” despite the way they treated his boss, Former Prez. Barack Obama (the first U.S. black president), when he was Obama’s vice president for eight years prior to Trump.

In his criticism, Tift claims that Biden still believes, “there are fine Republicans, and I look forward to working with them.”

And when criticizing Prez. Trump’s worthiness, Tift states that “although it was obvious from day one that Trump was woefully unfit to be president, it didn’t matter because he was a white man superseding a black man.”

He continues that, despite being the worse president imaginable, Trump survives lying, treason and impeachment, just so he can get a second term, all while destroying the country in the process.

With the claim that there is fear in the country that the demographics will change and that will make it more difficult for the Republicans to win presidential elections in the future, he said now is the “time to exploit white-anxiety for political gain.”

2020 Democratic Party Presidential Nominee Joe Biden.
— Provided photo

He infers Trump’s, “playbook/strategy: resentment, fear, and yes, hate. Thus, “’make America (hate) great again.’”

Thus, with all these issues, Tift believes that the Republicans are also looking forward to working with Biden because he is “either a double-agent or naïve.”

He also says the Republicans have a lot of dirt on Biden and that they still hate Obama.

“Joe will be treated like Obama during the election, win or lose,” he states.

And, “losing against Biden is the last thing Republicans worry about. …they are already celebrating. Biden…can’t be trusted, and he is weak…just the way the Republicans like it,” he states.

 

  • Greg Tift contributed to this report
Categories
Politics

Russia accepts Prez Obama’s sanctions

 

This new soap opera on the world’s stage is reuniting the global audiences’ favorite stars: The United States and Russia; and shows America standing up to Russia this week, winning back some of its eroded street cred.

 

The New York Times reports that, U.S. President Barack Obama has made good on his promise to impose sanctions on Russia in retaliation for its alleged hacking of the Democratic National Committee computers during the 2016 Presidential Election.

 

The United States, still claiming the mantle of benevolent protector of democracy, and Russia, back to its notorious tricks as a geopolitical instigator; while democrats are blaming Russia for helping Republican President-Elect Donald Trump win the election via the release of “digital dirt” that harmed Democratic Nominee Hillary Clinton.

Obama has punished the Russians by expelling 35 Russian diplomats (accused of being spies), imposed economic sanctions on four Russian intelligence officials, and closed two U.S. estates used by Russian diplomats.

Although the Russian Foreign Minister initially vowed that Russia would respond in kind and expel 35 American diplomats, Reuters reports that president Vladimir Putin has chosen to play nice instead, insisting that there will be no sending home of U.S. officials.

Putin, who has led the nation as either president or prime minister for 17 years as of December 31, appears to be trying to generate positive press by taking the high road.

The former KGB agent and controversial shirtless strongman-figure seems to be mimicking Barack Obama’s famous dirt-off-your-shoulder gesture, explained USA Today. By mocking the lame-duck status of the Obama administration, which cedes the White House on January 20, basically the Kremlin is trying to portray the new U.S. sanctions as no big deal.

Russia’s refusal to respond in kind to U.S. sanctions can be seen as having positive effects for the United States.

The United States stood up for itself, and punished a historic rival for meddling in our election, but without provoking a potentially devastating brawl.

This will improve America’s standing in the eyes of many of its allies, some of whom may have thought that the U.S. was getting a bit soft after refusing to respect its own “red line” in Syria.


According to Politico, President Obama insisted in August 2012, that the U.S. would respond harshly to any use of chemical weapons by Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, who was battling rebels in the ongoing Syrian Civil War. A year later, it turned out that al-Assad’s regime had indeed used such weapons, including against civilians. The Obama administration declined to respond militarily, earning it a black eye.

Standing up to Russia helps America prove its status as a world leader, both internationally and with domestic defense hawks. Many have claimed that America’s weak foreign policy stances during the early Obama years created a power vacuum that allowed Russia to seize Crimea and ISIS to evolve in the Middle East.

The imposition of sanctions on Russia for election meddling will also dissuade other mischievous states, such as North Korea, from attempting their own hacks of U.S. political parties and candidates.

If anyone thought they could try to interfere with America’s elections and receive only verbal rebukes, they now know otherwise.