Categories
Business Culture Digital - AI & Apps Economics Energy Entertainment News International & World Lifestyle News Now! Programs & Events Sports & Gaming Travel & Leisure

How to watch UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez livestream online

A few weeks after UFC 300, the mixed martial arts promotion company returns with UFC Fight Night, which has Brazilian fighter Matheus Nicolau (19-4-1) going up against American Alex Perez (24-8-0) in the main event.

 

UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez takes place at UFC Apex in Las Vegas, Nevada.

 

On Saturday, April 27, the prelims began at 4 p.m. ET/1 p.m. PT. The main card started at 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT. If you want to watch the event online, it livestreams with an ESPN+ subscription.

 

$503 and up

Last-minute tickets to UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perezin Las Vegas are still available on sites like Vivid Seats. meanwhile, you can use promo code VAR2024 to get $20 off your purchase at Vivid Seats. Tickets are also available at StubHub.

 

Want to watch UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez online? This event is streaming on ESPN+, ESPN and ESPN2, so there are a few ways to watch UFC Fight Night. Let’s break it down.

To watch UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez online, you’d have to sign up for a subscription to ESPN+ for $10.99/Month. If you don’t want to go month-to-month, you can sign up for an annual subscription for $109.99/Year — which is about a 15% savings from the monthly price.

 

$109.99/Year

BUY: ESPN+ ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION

You can also sign up for the Disney Trio — which includes ESPN+, Hulu and Disney+ — starting at $14.99/month.

 

In addition, UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perezbroadcasts on ESPN for the main card and ESPN2 for the prelims, which are both available to watch on DirecTV Stream, Fubo, Hulu + Live TV and Sling Orange. And since DirecTV Stream and Fubo offer free trials, you can watch UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez online for free.

 

Check out the full fight card below, and stream UFC Fight Night: Nicolau vs. Perez here.

 

Main Card, 7 p.m. ET/4 p.m. PT

  • Flyweight: Matheus Nicolau vs. Alex Perez — main event
  • Light Heavyweight: Ryan Spann vs. Bogdan Guskov — co-main event
  • Women’s Flyweight: Ariane Lipski vs. Karine Silva
  • Heavyweight: Austen Lane vs. Jhonata Diniz
  • Featherweight: Jonathan Pearce vs. David Onama
  • Welterweight: Tim Means vs. Uros Medic

 

Prelims, 4 p.m. ET/1 p.m. PT

  • Bantamweight: Rani Yahya vs. Victor Henry
  • Lightweight: Austin Hubbard vs. Michael Figlak
  • Heavyweight: Don’Tale Mayes vs. Caio Machado
  • Women’s Strawweight: Ketlen Souza vs. Marnic Mann
  • Lightweight: James Llontop vs. Chris Padilla
  • Women’s Flyweight: Ivana Petrovic vs. Na Liang
  • Lightweight: Maheshate Hayisaer vs. Gabriel Benitez

 

Read More

 

 

— Variety

Categories
Business Culture Digital - AI & Apps Economics Lifestyle News Now! Perks Science Technology

Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet disclose $32B+ in combined expenses for data centers, capital costs in Q1; they accelerate AI spending

—  The spending that the industry’s giants expect artificial intelligence to require is starting to come into focus — and it is jarringly large.

 

Karen Weise / New York Times:

 

 

If 2023 was the tech industry’s year of the A.I. chatbot, 2024 is turning out to be the year of A.I. plumbing. It may not sound as exciting, but tens of billions of dollars are quickly being spent on behind-the-scenes technology for the industry’s A.I. boom.

— Microsoft said generative A.I. had contributed to more than a fifth of the growth of its cloud computing business.Credit…Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg

 

Companies from Amazon to Meta are revamping their data centers to support artificial intelligence. They are investing in huge new facilities, while even places like Saudi Arabia are racing to build supercomputers to handle A.I. Nearly everyone with a foot in tech or giant piles of money, it seems, is jumping into a spending frenzy that some believe could last for years.

 

Microsoft, Meta, and Google’s parent company, Alphabet, disclosed this week that they had spent more than $32 billion combined on data centers and other capital expenses in just the first three months of the year. The companies all said in calls with investors that they had no plans to slow down their A.I. spending.

 

In the clearest sign of how A.I. has become a story about building a massive technology infrastructure, Meta said on Wednesday that it needed to spend billions more on the chips and data centers for A.I. than it had previously signaled.

 

“I think it makes sense to go for it, and we’re going to,” Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, said in a call with investors.

 

The eye-popping spending reflects an old parable in Silicon Valley: The people who made the biggest fortunes in California’s gold rush weren’t the miners — they were the people selling the shovels. No doubt Nvidia, whose chip sales have more than tripled over the last year, is the most obvious A.I. winner.

 

The money being thrown at technology to support artificial intelligence is also a reminder of spending patterns of the dot-com boom of the 1990s. For all of the excitement around web browsers and newfangled e-commerce websites, the companies making the real money were software giants like Microsoft and Oracle, the chipmaker Intel, and Cisco Systems, which made the gear that connected those new computer networks together.

But cloud computing has added a new wrinkle: Since most start-ups and even big companies from other industries contract with cloud computing providers to host their networks, the tech industry’s biggest companies are spending big now in hopes of luring customers.

 

Google’s capital expenditures — largely the money that goes into building and outfitting data centers — almost doubled in the first quarter, the company said. Microsoft’s were up 22 percent. Amazon, which will report earnings on Tuesday, is expected to add to that growth.

 

Meta’s investors were unhappy with Mr. Zuckerberg, sending his company’s share price down more than 16 percent after the call. But Mr. Zuckerberg, who just a few years ago was pilloried by shareholders for a planned spending spree on augmented and virtual reality, was unapologetic about the money that his company is throwing at A.I. He urged patience, potentially for years.

 

“Our optimism and ambitions have just grown quite a bit,” he said.

 

Investors had no problem stomaching Microsoft’s spending. Microsoft is the only major tech company to report financial details of its generative A.I. business, which it said had contributed to more than a fifth of the growth of its cloud computing business. That amounted to $1 billion in three months, analysts estimated.

 

Microsoft said its generative A.I. business could have been even bigger — if the company had enough data center supply to meet the demand, underscoring the need to keep on building.

 

Read More

 

 

— Techmeme

Categories
Art & Life Culture Lifestyle News Now! Perks Perspectives Programs & Events

AFI Life Achievement Award honors Nicole Kidman’s career: From ‘Expats’ to those AMC ads?

Nicole Kidman has been an international treasure going on four decades. Whether you’re tracking her many wigs (“The Undoing” is our favorite), admiring her textured and committed performances, or just standing up and saluting before every AMC Theatres showing, you’re probably honoring her in some way.

 

While five best actress Oscar nominations and one win (for “The Hours”) have been adequate markers of her success and endurance, conversations have been brewing for years about a lack of recognition for her remarkable artistic consistency.

 

“How many times does Nicole Kidman have to prove herself?” asked author Anne Helen Peterson in a 2017 essay for BuzzFeed, one that examined how esteem is or isn’t doled out to women in Hollywood, using Kidman as a template.

 

“While male actors coast on the brilliance of a single performance for years, female stars have to reapply for greatness on a yearly basis, fighting the industry-wide impulse for gossip about their personal lives and their appearances to subsume substantial conversation about their ability,” Peterson wrote nearly 10 years ago, on the heels of the runaway hit first season of “Big Little Lies,” starring Kidman.

 

After a 2023 delay due to the SAG-AFTRA strike, the American Film Institute hopes to correct this cultural error by handing Kidman its Life Achievement Award Saturday. Broadcast on TNT, the tribute makes for glorious cinema pageantry, sitting our film idols on a dais and trotting out an army of famous faces to pay tribute to them in between movie clips.

 

AFI president Bob Gazzale, who wrote the upcoming Kidman show and serves as executive producer, watched roughly 80 films and series from the actor’s archive in an effort to capture her versatility. Only with Kidman do you get “The Stepford Wives” remake next to an adaptation of Phillip Roth’s “The Human Stain.” Or Gus Van Sant’s “To Die For” along with Adam Sandler’s “Just Go With It.” Or Jonathan Glazer’s criminally underrated “Birth” alongside the campy “Batman Forever.”

 

Gazzale caught up with Variety to discuss his grand plans for Kidman, offer a look inside AFI’s selection process and tease some surprises in store.

 

There are so few formats like the Life Achievement Award on live television now. We’ve moved away from this kind of thing thanks to social media and how video moves now. So why Nicole Kidman, and why now?

In the long and proud tradition of this award, Nicole embodies the glamour and the romance of Hollywood past. But she also has the daring and the bravery of one of this art form’s great character actors. She’s a true screen icon, but she’s also a risk-taker. Each performance is something new and something profound.

 

Read More

 

 

— Variety

Categories
Art & Life Culture Education Lifestyle News Now! Perspectives Programs & Events

Lesniak inducted into the Rutgers University Hall of Distinguished Alumni

UNION, N.J. — On April 25, former Senator Raymond J. Lesniak was inducted into the Rutgers University Hall of Distinguished Alumni among four other influential Rutgers University graduates.

 

Lesniak was recognized at Stone House at Stirling Ridge for his exemplary work in the New Jersey Legislature and as President and Founder of The Lesniak Institute for American Leadership. This award is the highest achievement a Rutgers graduate can receive from the University.

 

He has been a persistent champion of social and criminal justice, animal welfare, women’s rights, and environmental protection. During his time in the legislature he sponsored the most significant laws to protect the environment, was a leading advocate for legalizing same-sex marriage, fought to abolish New Jersey’s death penalty, and marked his name in sports history with his legendary legislative and legal fight that lead to the United States Supreme Court making sports betting legal in America.

 

In addition to these great accomplishments, he has published books about these legislative and legal battles: The Road to Abolition: How New Jersey Abolished the Death Penalty, What’s Love got to Do with it?, Beating the Odds, and most recently Cultivating Justice in the Garden State: My Life in the Colorful World of New Jersey Politics.

 

About the Lesniak Institute for American Leadership

The Lesniak Institute is developing the next generation of American leaders by teaching the principles of effective advocacy, offering first-hand experience through its causes, and partnering with grassroots organizations. The Institute is named for Senator Raymond J. Lesniak who authored and sponsored hundreds of laws during his 40 years in the New Jersey Legislature to advance human rights and the quality of life for millions. • LesniakInstitute.org

Categories
Business Culture Economics International & World Lifestyle Local News Perks Travel & Leisure

Congresswoman Watson-Coleman, County Exec Benson unveil 4.1M grant award for Trenton-Mercer Airport taxiway

EWING, N.J. — Congresswoman Bonnie Watson-Coleman has secured Trenton-Mercer Airport a $4.1 million allocation in Congress’s most recent appropriations bill.

A press conference was held Thursday with Mercer County Exec. Dan Benson, Congresswoman Bonnie Watson-Coleman, Assemblywoman Verlina Reynolds-Jackson, Assemblyman Anthony Verrelli, Commissioner Chair John Cimino, Commissioner Vice-Chair Kristin McLaughlin, Commissioner Lucylle Walter, Commissioner Sam Frisby, Trenton Mayor Reed Gusciora, and Ewing Mayor Bert Steinmann.

The project includes the full-depth reconstruction of 20,000 SY of airfield taxiway and apron pavement. The full-depth reconstruction of the taxiway will allow Trenton-Mercer Airport to enhance overall aircraft safety by giving them more reliable pavement to operate on. The new taxiway is essential to Mercer County’s larger terminal replacement project.

“Congresswoman Bonnie Watson-Coleman, has once again demonstrated tremendous leadership for Mercer County, and the region with her advocacy in securing over 4 million dollars for the reconstruction of Taxiway Alpha. I look forward to us continuing to work hand-in-hand to make Trenton-Mercer Airport’s Terminal Replacement Project a success,” said Mercer Executive Dan Benson.

“Mercer County is at a pivotal point and as someone who has spent their career as an infrastructure professional, we have a unique opportunity to position ourselves a as a geographic transportation hub,” said County Commissioner Chairman John Cimino.

“County Executive Benson has an innovative vision for Mercer County and I am delighted to be a tireless, vigilant Congressional champion in securing Mercer County their fair share to deliver for our residents, “said Congresswoman Bonnie Watson-Coleman.

For additional information, please reach out to Theo Siggelakis at TSiggelakis@Mercercounty.org.

Categories
Art & Life Culture Education International & World Lifestyle Programs & Events Travel & Leisure

Rana Daggubati’s Spirit Media, Tinkle Comics launch Indian superhero graphic novel ‘Minnal Murali’

“Baahubali” star Rana Daggubati’s Spirit Media has teamed with Tinkle Comics to launch a graphic novel featuring Indian superhero Minnal Murali at the Mumbai Comic-Con.

 

“Minnal Murali” is a 2021 Malayalam-language film directed by Basil Joseph, produced by Sophia Paul’s Weekend Blockbusters and starring Tovino Thomas as the eponymous superhero.

 

Set in a village in Kerala, the film follows a tailor with dreams of emigrating to the U.S. and a social outcast who simultaneously get superpowers when struck by lightning (minnal means lightning in Malayalam) with the former using them for good and the latter for evil. It was acquired by Netflix and had a direct-to-digital release on the service during the pandemic and remains one of its most popular films.

 

The graphic novel will delve into the superhero’s origins and unveil a new story that takes his adventures further.

 

Spirit Media unveiled film, TV and comic-book projects with a variety of partners at the San Diego Comic-Con last year. Tinkle, which was established in 1980, is published by India’s oldest comic-book brand Amar Chitra Katha and is known for its homegrown characters including Suppandi and Shikari Shambu. “Minnal Murali” is Tinkle’s first publication in the graphic novel format.

 

Daggubati said: “The debut of Tinkle’s graphic novel ‘Minnal Murali’ at Mumbai Comic-Con marks a significant milestone for reaffirming the love for Indian superheroes and comics, furthermore, resonating with the unmet need of Indian comic lovers in the digital age. It is a moment of great pride and excitement to continue the universe of this much-loved contemporary Indian superhero and bring him to life from the screen to a comic.”

 

Paul added: “Seeing our beloved characters and captivating storylines come to life on the vibrant pages is a testament to the enduring impact of our film, inspiring fans to embark on new adventures within this rich and dynamic universe.”

 

President and CEO of Amar Chitra Katha and Tinkle, Preeti Vyas, said: “Books are often converted to films, but this project is a great example of how a popular film franchise has been taken into the pages of a book, with a brand-new story based on the characters of the super successful movie, ‘Minnal Murali’ in a graphic novel format. We are very excited about exploring other such transmedia opportunities for Tinkle Comics Studio.”

 

Gayathri Chandrasekaran, editor-in-chief of Tinkle Comics, added: “‘Minnal Murali’ has captivated the nation’s imagination, and we’re excited to bring a brand-new ‘Minnal Murali’ story to life in this dynamic new format. This graphic novel is just the beginning of Tinkle’s foray into new storytelling mediums, and we’re committed to delivering even more exciting content in the future.”

 

 

Read More

 

 

— Variety (EXCLUSIVE) 

Categories
Art & Life Business Culture Lifestyle Perspectives

‘The Blair Witch Project’ cast ask Lionsgate for retroactive residuals and ‘meaningful consultation’ on future projects

The directors and producers of the groundbreaking 1999 horror film release a separate statement in support: ‘We believe the actors deserve to be celebrated for their enduring association with the franchise’

 

 

Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard and Michael Williams, stars of the seminal horror film “The Blair Witch Project,” released a public letter to Lionsgate on Saturday asking for more robust compensation for their work on the 1999 blockbuster, as well as “meaningful consultation” on any future “Blair Witch” projects that use their names or likenesses.

 

The statement comes 10 days after Lionsgate and Blumhouse announced they plan to revive the franchise with a new movie that would provide, in the words of Lionsgate Motion Picture Group chair Adam Fogelson, “new vision for ‘Blair Witch’ that will reintroduce this horror classic for a new generation.” Lionsgate did not produce or distribute the original 1999 film. It acquired the property through its 2003 buyout of independent film distributor Artisan Entertainment.

 

The Lionsgate-Blumhouse announcement sparked a strongly worded response via social media from Leonard, who said that no one had contacted him or his costars about the project in advance. “At this point, it’s 25 years of disrespect from the folks who’ve pocketed the lion’s share (pun intended) of the profits from OUR work, and that feels both icky and classless,” Leonard wrote.

 

Leonard said that the actors — who shot and improvised the independent movie over roughly a week on a shoestring budget, using their real names for their characters — each made $300,000 from a buyout of their ownership points on the film, which went on to gross $248 million worldwide. In 2002, the actors sued Artisan Entertainment for using their names and likenesses in the studio’s 2000 sequel, “Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2.”

 

In their most recent statement, Leonard, Williams and Donahue (who now goes by Rei Hance) call on Lionsgate to provide them with retroactive and future residual payments “equivalent to the sum that would’ve been allotted through SAG-AFTRA, had we had proper union or legal representation when the film was made.”

 

They also ask for “meaningful consultation on any future ‘Blair Witch’ reboot, sequel, prequel, toy, game, ride, escape room, etc., in which one could reasonably assume that Heather, Michael & Josh’s names and/or likenesses will be associated for promotional purposes in the public sphere.”

 

Lionsgate first attempted to revive the franchise with the 2016 sequel “Blair Witch,” which earned $45 million worldwide. The company also operates a Blair Witch-themed Escape room in Las Vegas.

 

Finally, the actors request Lionsgate create a $60,000 “Blair Witch Grant” that would be bestowed to “an unknown/aspiring genre filmmaker to assist in making their first feature film.”

 

A spokesperson for Lionsgate had no comment.

 

Separately, “The Blair Witch Project” directors Eduardo Sanchez and Dan Myrick, producers Gregg Hale and Robin Cowie, and co-producer Michael Monello released a joint statement supporting the actors.

 

“While we, the original filmmakers, respect Lionsgate’s right to monetize the intellectual property as it sees fit, we must highlight the significant contributions of the original cast  — Heather Donahue, Joshua Leonard, and Mike Williams,” they say in the statement. “As the literal faces of what has become a franchise, their likenesses, voices, and real names are inseparably tied to ‘The Blair Witch Project.’ Their unique contributions not only defined the film’s authenticity but continue to resonate with audiences around the world.”

 

Read More

 

 

— Variety

Categories
Art & Life Business Culture Digital - AI & Apps Economics Lifestyle Perks Perspectives Regulations & Security Travel & Leisure

How TikTok has influenced US culture: shaped Hollywood, privacy, shopping, news, music, mental health, national security, and more

— TikTok has changed America

 

New York Times:

 

 

—  Has there ever been an app more American seeming than TikTok, with its messy democratic creativity, exhibitionism, utter lack of limits and vast variety of hustlers?

 

And yet, of course, TikTok is not American, which is the whole reason that in March, the House of Representatives passed a bill with broad bipartisan support that would force the Chinese owners of the video-app juggernaut to either sell to a non-Chinese owner or face a ban. Lawmakers say it’s a national security threat, and that the Chinese government could lean on its owner, ByteDance, to obtain sensitive U.S. user data or influence content on the app to serve its interests.

 

There’s a long road of legislation, deal making and legal challenges ahead before TikTok could be forced to change ownership or even be banned. The Senate would need to pass the legislation — which it may do as soon, now that the House has bundled it into a foreign aid package. It would have to survive lawsuits from TikTok and creators. Buyers would have to clear regulatory approval. And after all that, Beijing could simply block a deal.

 

But imagining what a United States without TikTok would look like throws into sharp relief just how much the app has worked its way into American culture.

 

TikTok, which officially landed in the United States in 2018, was the most downloaded app in the country, and the world, in 2020, 2021 and 2022. It wasn’t that the elements of it were so new — compelling videos from randos had long been a staple of American pop culture — but TikTok put the pieces together in a new way.

 

Unlike Instagram, Facebook or Snapchat, TikTok didn’t build itself around social connections. Its goal is pure, uncut entertainment. The algorithm ingested every data point it could from what users skipped, liked or shared — and spat it directly into the maddeningly habit-forming For You Page. Fans whispered reverently that it knew them better than they knew themselves.

 

Here are 19 ways of understanding how TikTok became part of American life. The music America listens to, the movies it sees, what conspiracies it believes, how it can make or break a product’s success, who it defines as a celebrity — all of it has been influenced by TikTok, for good and bad. Even if you’ve never opened the app, you’ve lived in a culture that exists downstream of what happens there.

 

Read More

 

 

— Techmeme

Categories
Art & Life Business Culture International & World Lifestyle Programs & Events

Nusrat Imrose Tisha, Mostofa Sarwar Farooki’s ‘Something Like an Autobiography’ sets Channel 4 deal

Bangladeshi filmmakers Mostofa Sarwar Farooki and Nusrat Imrose Tisha‘s “Something Like an Autobiography” has been acquired for U.K. broadcast by Channel 4.

 

The film had its world premiere at the 2023 Busan International Film Festival, where was in the prestigious Jiseok competition. It was also a part of the South Asian icon strand at the 2023 Mumbai Film Festival.

 

The film follows Dhaka-based married couple, the filmmaker Farhan (Farooki) and actor Tithi (Tisha), who are under societal pressure to have a baby. Tithi conceives and towards the end of her pregnancy term an incident occurs that throws into sharp relief some realities of contemporary Bangladeshi society.

 

The title, a nod to Kurosawa Akira’s celebrated memoir, is also reflective of the real lives of Farooki and Tisha, a real-life celebrity couple who are the most recognized filmmaker and actor in Bangladesh, respectively.

 

“This is a special film for me and Tisha. Personal, embarrassing and rewarding at the same time. I am happy the film will be seen by the Channel 4 audience. Hope they will be able to connect with the universal theme although portrayed through local details,” Farooki told Variety.

 

The film is produced by Redoan Rony for Bangladeshi streaming platform Chorki and co-produced by Nina Lath, Anna Katchko and Tisha. It is a part of Chorki’s 12-film project “Ministry of Love.”

 

Chorki CEO Rony said: “Channel 4 is an esteemed broadcaster. We are glad that they chose our film to showcase it to their audience. Chorki always wants to make quality films and series. This is a clear sign we are moving in the right direction.”

 

“Something Like an Autobiography” plays next at the Sydney Film Festival.

 

Farooki’s “Last Defenders of Monogamy” is also part of the “Ministry of Love” anthology.

 

Next up for Farooki is U.K.-based Hindi and English-language romance “To Hell With Love,” which recently participated in the first edition of India’s Cinevesture International Film Festival’s project market.

 

Read More

 

 

— Variety (EXCLUSIVE) 

Categories
Culture Education Lifestyle Perspectives Regulations & Security Technology

Parents who need to reach their kids at all times, have become unexpected, forceful opponents of schools’ attempts to ban phones

—  Students’ phone use is disruptive, but teachers and administrators seeking a fix face an unlikely opponent

 

Julie Jargon / Wall Street Journal:

 

 

—  A rural school district in Colorado tried to ban smartphones. Parents stood in the way.

 

Phones were at the center of more than half the schools’ disciplinary issues by 2022—not just kids watching TikTok and YouTube in class, but cyberbullying, spying in bathrooms and recording fights.

Teachers and administrators say gadget bans are the only way to regain student focus and tamp down on misbehavior. Parents complain that they need to be able to reach their kids at all times, both for emergencies and routine scheduling issues. Parents are turning out to be unexpected but forceful opponents of schools’ attempts to keep kids off their smartphones.

 

In Brush, Colo., teachers and administrators settled on a compromise for the 2022-23 school year. Students could keep their phones, provided they were out of sight. To reach their parents, they needed a teacher’s permission and had to use the phone in the office. If a student was busted, the phone was confiscated and a parent needed to pick it up.

The policy, which is still in effect, was too much for some parents, says Brush School District superintendent Bill Wilson. Several parents transferred their students.

Administrators say they are trying to do what’s best for students. Experts often blame smartphones for fueling the youth mental-health crisis, through social media and its most angst-amplifying features. Teachers say they spend too much time policing phone use. And even school systems that are so far reluctant to ban phones know the fights are just beginning.

‘A disconnect with parents’

About a quarter of notifications hitting teens’ phones daily come during school hours, according to a recent Common Sense Media report. Teens use smartphones for a median of 43 minutes during the school day, said the report, the primary time-suck being social-media and messaging apps.

 

Parents are often the ones texting their kids, teachers say.

“There seems to be a disconnect with parents,” says Liz Shulman, an English teacher at Evanston Township High School in Illinois, where phones are expected to be put away during class. “They often sound very supportive of cellphone policies and they want their kids to learn, but they also want access to them at all times.”

Dozens of parents told me they support school cellphone bans.

But in a recent poll from the nonprofit National Parents Union, most parents who supported banning phones in class said they should be allowed at other times, such as passing periods, lunch and recess.

 

“Parents want a direct line to their kids during the school day,” says Ariel Taylor Smith, senior director of policy and action for the National Parents Union.

She, too, likes being able to reach her 8-year-old son by phone during the school day. “We should be teaching students how to use cellphones responsibly, not banning them,” says Taylor Smith, a former high-school teacher.

School shootings have raised parents’ anxiety. As a mother of three, I’m certainly as worried as any other parent about school violence. School-safety experts say that using phones during an emergency can endanger kids. Ringing or buzzing phones can give away the location of a kid who is trying to hide from an intruder, and parents on the line can distract students from following lifesaving instructions from school personnel.

Day to day, parents are mostly texting kids things that can wait til the dismissal bell, teachers tell me—practice reminders, pickup changes and other such minutiae.

Students comprehend more and have less anxiety when phones aren’t present, some studies show. A Massachusetts boarding school I wrote aboutfound that students became more engaged in class after it banned smartphones.

Even the partial ban at the Brush school district in Colorado last year was effective: Visits to the principal’s office fell sharply among high-schoolers compared with the year before, Wilson says.

Normalizing no phones

Mark Daniel, superintendent of Fort Wayne Community Schools in Indiana, told parents earlier this year that the district would test a cellphone ban, to run through the end of the school year.

The district began locking up students’ phones at two middle schools and two high schools in mid-March. The exercise would help determine whether discipline and classroom engagement improved in the absence of phones.

 

 

Read More

 

 

— Techmeme